Cognitive Offloading Risks Versus Potential Short Term Gains.

Someone asked me yesterday, “Why do you think people aren’t taking the cognitive decline and other trade offs of using AI and digital tools more seriously?”. Of course, this has to do with the dangers of cognitive offloading in the context of use of AI rather than cognitive decline, but I knew what was meant.

I responded with a skeleton reply – it was on LinkedIn, after all, and don’t feel like feeding their AI too much. I also asked a few different AIs, and I was surprised at how poor the responses on that were until I remembered that they were trained on writing done for marketing.

We Ourselves Are Limited

Our brains, according to the latest research, only process information at about 10 bits/second. That’s not very much. Also, our attention spans at last check were at about 47 seconds.

Toss in Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and the increased income disparity, we can see how it can be more challenging for some than others.

Continue reading

Bits of Me, Bits of You, Decaying to Nurture Society

I’m not afraid of much, when once I was afraid of many things. I tend to dive into my fears until they are fears no more. So I began interrogating myself about my fears a little more and found one. I don’t know what to call it.

It’s the bits of me that I share that I am most afraid of, not because they expose me but because I’m afraid of running out of bits. There are bits of me around the world, in little digital devices and held by people who I know and have known. There are bits of me here and there, flotsam and jetsam of my life given willingly, given unwillingly, and all the shades of willingly in between.

Surely this is a strange fear. The idea that the bits of us are finite could mean that we are born with a predetermined number of bits. That doesn’t make sense because as we grow and become embedded into the world we as individuals live in, we change – hopefully for the better, sometimes for the worse as our base personality and the world generate friction and erode each other. The world generally wins in that, sandpapering our personality into something that fits.

Continue reading

Let’s Talk About That Hyperspace Bypass In Democrat and Republican Terms.

There’s a lot that has happened in short order in the United States, and I have to say – I’m not really that happy about it. It’s not that I didn’t expect it, but expectations and seeing reality form are two different things.

It’s a lot to soak in.

Because things have gotten so weird, I want to express my thoughts on hyperspace bypasses. If we follow that metaphor, we can see that the Vogons demonstrate both Democrat and Republican behavior.

Since everyone is busy picking on all the idiocy that is happening that is the new Republican Party (or some argue, the old Republican party with the mask dropped), I’ll start with the Democrats:

Democrat-Like Vogon Behaviors

  1. Endless Committees and Task Forces
    • Prioritize forming committees to analyze and deliberate endlessly before making decisions, ensuring everyone feels included, even if progress is slow.
  2. Complex Legislation
    • Craft convoluted, overly detailed laws designed to address every possible edge case but often bogged down in impractical implementation.
  3. Hyper-Regulation
    • Advocate for strict oversight in the name of fairness, equity, and environmental protection, often leading to labyrinthine rules that frustrate implementation.
  4. Compassionate Bureaucracy
    • Attempt to frame authoritarian decisions as necessary for the greater good or social justice, sometimes overlooking individual autonomy in favor of collective solutions.
  5. Poetry as Policy
    • Use elaborate rhetoric and idealistic language to justify policies that can seem disconnected from pragmatic realities (akin to Vogon poetry’s abstract absurdity).

The Democrats basically represent a system that the American public sees as broken, partly because the Democratic party is the last party in power. Is that fair? Maybe not, but Luigi Mangione didn’t kill a CEO because he thought things were going well with healthcare insurance, and the support he has demonstrates a level of anger at a system seen as unjust. The election of Trump is pretty much the same thing, it seems.

Never-mind the lobbyism and corporate interests, but that’s sort of common with the Republicans.

So let’s move on to the Republicans.

Republican-Like Vogon Behaviors

  1. Rigid Rule Enforcement
    • Emphasize strict adherence to rules and traditions, often prioritizing authority and order over adaptability or change, or justice.
  2. Deregulation Irony
    • Push for the removal of “unnecessary regulations” while creating equally complex systems of their own, especially around national security or corporate interests.
  3. Cultural Conservatism
    • Justify Vogon-like authoritarianism as preserving “the way things have always been,” valuing tradition over experimentation or innovation.
  4. Business-Centric Authoritarianism
    • Advocate for policies that favor corporations or industry elites while framing rigid decisions as necessary for economic growth.
  5. Blunt Messaging
    • Communicate in direct, sometimes harsh terms, prioritizing effectiveness over nuanced or empathetic delivery, much like a Vogon officer giving orders.

That speaks for itself, doesn’t it? The blunt messaging of Trump, often filtered by people that follow him as “but what he really meant was”, and the fact that he found all the big tech billionaires for his inauguration… and the conservatism behind “Make America Great Again” shows a demand for going back to the way things were, which has people who couldn’t even vote not too long ago understandably nervous.

The ‘deregulation’ lines up with the ‘Department of Efficiency’ which, ironically, has two leaders – one who made a strangely familiar salute, and one of East Indian descent.

Yeah, this tracks.

Certainly there are some things that the Republicans and Democrats have in a Vogon context, right?

Shared Vogon Behaviors

  1. Lack of Transparency
    • Both sides may engage in Vogon-esque obfuscation, making processes and decisions inaccessible or incomprehensible to the general public.
  2. Red Tape Galore
    • Generate systems so mired in procedure and formalities that they hinder meaningful action, regardless of the side they represent, while they say that they will effectively remove red tape… with more red tape.
  3. Self-Interest as Principle
    • Veil self-serving actions in a cloak of principle or necessity, creating a “justification poetry” for what might otherwise be seen as selfish or myopic decisions.
  4. Overzealous Compliance
    • Strictly enforce rules (often ones they create) in a way that feels overly punitive or needlessly bureaucratic to outsiders.

This all tracks. The problem isn’t the Democrats and Republicans, it’s both of them. It’s the Vogons.

Vogons don’t even like Vogons, yet we keep electing Vogons because if we don’t the wrong Vogon might get elected.

The parties created a system that works for them, and they call upon the people only when they need the people.

I realize that this may upset people of either party, but it’s my experience that Vogons are generally unhappy anyway.

I’ll lean on Buckminster Fuller to finish this.

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the new model obsolete." - Buckminster Fuller

Living Between Moments.

With the volunteer stuff I’m doing related to the residential community, we had put up a solar light at a guard booth where cars enter and exit the compound. It’s been finicky, and it has become a bit of a personal project for me, so I have been at the guard booth for periods of time over the night.

It’s how I got that picture of the moon and streetlight.

People come home through this gate, to our collective and their individual home. Some are friendly, some don’t even look at the booth, some are in a bad mood of some sort or another, but most are only aware of an obstacle in their private worlds. I think that’s a shame, but it is not my job to wake those asleep.

The awake share a common world, but the asleep turn aside into private worlds.

Heraclitus

I’m known by many in the community, so some will stop and chat if no one is behind them. Some people leave the compound while I’m there to get some of their exercise in outdoors rather than the treadmills in gyms that people drive to, and we spend a few moments talking about this and that.

After I took that picture, my mind ran on the importance of the moments between moments. We talk about our heart rates which we count when our hearts contract, but we don’t talk about what happens between them, when our hearts relax. The relaxation between contractions is just as necessary as the contractions because of the way the heart works.

We live between heartbeats just as much as we live with each heartbeat. Maybe we do not speak about between the heartbeats because of some mortal dread, that fear of death, the unknown, where some find solace in religious predictions of what happens beyond that final heart relaxation.

In the same way, we live between moments we remember – maybe the pleasant memories of successes and the unpleasant memories of failures.

The thought ends as the street light goes out, the moon remaining in the early morning. I ponder it throughout the day.

The moon had not moved much, and yet I had all these complete thoughts between the light being on and turning off as the sun crept up behind me.

Things happen outside our private worlds that connect them into the common world, and some of us do not notice for we are asleep in our delusions of counting heartbeats while ignoring the space between heartbeats.

We need to remember to live between moments, I think.

Is It Worth Mimicking The Human Condition?

What does it mean to be human? We look for a collective answer to that question so often, and we never find it – maybe because there isn’t one.

If you look back in your past, you might remember doing something that felt so right. Maybe it was hitting a ball with a bat, maybe it was solving some sort of problem, maybe it was writing something down that suddenly clicked. Whatever it was, that’s a good indicator of who you are. You’re not limited to one thing, either. You can be as many things as you get those feelings from. It’s a tropism. It’s an orbit, sometimes elliptical, sometimes more round, something that you always gravitate towards. That’s the part of being you that also happens to be a part of being human – the stuff that feels right for you differs from what others may feel – but we all feel it in some way.

And then there’s the part of being human where you shake the tension off, rolling your shoulders as you stop feeling the weight and start feeling the strength that you had forgotten under the weight. Or that you walked so far that even as you sit you feel your legs still feel like they’re in motion. Of that feeling of the wind through one’s hair.

There’s a range of other emotions, too, that make us human and that we try to attribute to other creatures – happiness, sadness, anger… and all the shades in between and that lines that connect them.

A machine, no matter how clever, can’t do that. They can now, however, express that from simply scanning what more than 10,000 primates put on the internet because 0.1% of the primates don’t think the 10,000 matter more than they do other than as revenue streams. Oh, how I could warm to that topic…

AI can pretend to be us. But it will never be us. We’re a lot more fun to create than AI if you know how to do it right, and if you don’t, there are instructional videos on the Internet that demonstrate how not to do it.

Authenticity in Writing in an Age of AI

Somebody asked – I think it was on LinkedIn – about the authenticity of writing in this age where AI gobblygook is becoming ubiquitous on the Internet. Toss a LLM something and it will likely tell you how to do it better, without the imagined smug look we might associate with an human editor.

I don’t know that I’ve read much authentic ever. All of these words we use were handed down to us, we rarely make new ones and when we do some don’t last. If you can’t think of one, it didn’t last. How we merge these words together is more taught than imagined, and while some may have suffered all manner of training in language, what reinforces how we communicate is how we read.

We’ve been reading Search Engine Optimized (SEO) content for at least 2 decades. SEO content was designed for search engines. So now we have a few generations who have consumed writing – for those that still read – have had their writing influenced by de facto marketing content. Blech.

Continue reading

Don’t Let The World Squeeze The Creativity Out of You.

A large robot in a colorful forest setting.

I made the mistake of reading some posts on LinkedIn and in one of the comments someone mentioned that the creative industry is ‘esoteric’, a word that basically meant in the context that they didn’t matter. This in the context of AI, content scraping, et al, seems pretty insulting to me and I’m not one that wears creativity on my sleeve.

It’s dismissive, though I grant you the use of the word ‘esoteric’ was somewhat creative. It also does the whole ecosystem of creativity an injustice. After all, what is a lack of creativity?

Conformity, stagnancy, conventional, repetitive, rigid, derivative, apathetic, disengaged, mechanical, formulaic… the list goes on. Now, show me an industry that markets itself as any of those things.

Yet the original comment demonstrates a rigidity of thought that doesn’t likely have the capacity to fathom creativity at scale.

Continue reading

2024 Ruminations: Navigating Toward 2025

This post has been in the making over the course of a few days, much longer than usual, but I have been ruminating and getting interrupted by life and it’s distractions which ended up helping me finish it. Writing is like that sometimes.

Everyone’s going to be writing lists and going over the highlights of 2024, making predictions about 2025, and otherwise fighting for readership in the “Everyone Else Is Doing It” spiral toward zero. Sure, when you’re younger, it seems bold and new – but trust me, it’s not that bold or that new.

It’s outright boring when you start abstracting it away. What matters is what matters to you, and if you’re going to spend your time talking about other people, or waxing nostalgic about a single year (!) I have bad news: AI can probably do it better than you. It probably should, too, since those are low hanging fruit.

Lemme see what happened this year and write about it! And I can write about next year and it will likely be all wrong but if I get one thing right the whole planet will bow to my wisdom!

What should I write?“, Boring People, 0-2025
Continue reading