Firearm Policy, Crime, and the Unspoken Realities in Trinidad and Tobago

A man at a desk staring at a matrix with the Trinidad and Tobago flag in the background, transparent.

In Trinidad and Tobago, there is much discussion about crime because… well, there’s been a lot of crime, so much so that there’s a Wikipedia page on crime in Trinidad and Tobago. Every administration blames the last administration, playing checkers for getting elected, but the crime has risen through all involved political parties running things over the past 3 decades.

The latest stab – or shot – at crime seems to be giving everyone gun licenses. On the surface, it gives a lot of people a sense of security to be able to get something only criminals seem to have. Right after an election, any criticism of the present government is seen as ‘anti-UNC’ – the political party that won was UNC. Just as any criticism of the past administration was seen as ‘anti-PNM’.

It’s a tired way of shutting down valid conversations. I have seen it in every country I’ve lived in or visited. Group-think offers comfort, and that comfort rivals religion in its power.

I do not care for politics. Both major parties are interchangeable to me. I criticize what I know in the hope that something useful can grow through the cracks in the political concrete.

My Criticism Of Stand Your Ground Laws and Firearm User License Propagation.

Really, I don’t have much criticism of these ideas. I myself applied for a weapon more than once in Trinidad and Tobago some decades ago, where I was told behind closed doors who to bribe and who I would have to buy the gun from. Oddly, the present political party in charge then is the same party.

I do not have much issue with the idea of responsible gun ownership. I myself applied for a firearm license in Trinidad and Tobago more than once, decades ago. I was told who to bribe and who I would need to buy the weapon from.

My applications were “lost.”

I got the bureaucratic shuffle that corruption feeds on.

The thing about it is that I have owned guns in the United States for decades. I am a U.S. Navy veteran and having worked with the United States Marine Corps as their Corpsman, I got not only to train further with weapons but also further in dealing with the wounds. In essence, I know what I’m talking about.

The criticism is here: with more firearms licenses comes more guns to civilians. Training requirements aren’t very high, and the understanding of the responsibility of having a weapon is not seemingly making the rounds as much as the political grandstanding.

My Criticism of Stand Your Ground Laws and Firearm License Expansion

Legal access to guns means new risks. People who did not have firearms before could now shoot themselves or someone else by accident.

It might not happen often. It might happen frequently. But it will happen.
That risk depends entirely on how good the training is.

No one is talking about that. They should be.

Continue reading

The Morality of Process, the Probability of Outcome

A glowing human asking a digital oracle for guidance

There is a tendency in modern discourse to force everything into binaries. Right or wrong. Good or evil. Us or them. These binaries create the illusion of clarity, but what they often do is reduce the complexity of life into digestible, weaponized arguments disguised as morality.

The truth is rarely that simple, if ever.

I often find myself straddling different ways of thinking. I assign weight to values, to beliefs, to truths, and let them exist in tension. I live in a world of shades, not one of absolutes. This does not mean I lack conviction. It means I acknowledge that convictions are not universal.

What is true for me can coexist with what is true for someone else, even when those truths do not agree, once we don’t push our truths on each other. Generally speaking, too, where there is truth there is commonality, for there are many paths to the truth and many angles of it.

Take a contentious example. It can be true that killing a fetus is murder. It can also be true that a woman has the right to make decisions about her own body. These two ideas do not cancel each other out. They are not mutually exclusive. They can exist simultaneously, and the people involved can bear the weight of those truths without outsourcing judgment to others. Unless someone is the other parent, it is no one else’s business.

That kind of thinking does not come from moral relativism. It comes from moral complexity. From understanding that ethics do not have to be imposed to be valid.

When it comes to outcomes, though, I shift. I think in probabilities. I watch the way people respond not to process, but to results. I see how we are trained to care more about whether our team wins than how the game is played.

This is where many lose sight of integrity.

Probabilistic thinking allows me to ask what is likely, not what is certain. It helps me prepare for multiple outcomes without pretending I can control them. But what it does not do is excuse the method. The method still matters.

What I see more and more is this: People are no longer concerned with the process unless it affects them personally. They are more likely to cheer their team for cheating and winning than for losing with principles. They will rationalize the shortcut. They will defend it as strategy.

But process is character.

You cannot build a just world by violating the path that leads to it.

You cannot manufacture truth through deception and call it communication.

So while I allow for complex truths, and while I navigate outcomes through probability, I hold to this: The way something is done matters as much as what is done.

That is not idealism. That is survival with integrity.

And maybe that is the real lesson here. You do not have to impose your morality on others. But you do have to live by it if you expect to be an example of why it should be lived by.

Not because it guarantees the outcome.
But because it defines the person you are on the way there.

And that defines who you are when you arrive.

The journey defines the destination.

The Bright Darkness.

A dark night, with lights from the city striking the clouds

There’s a bright darkness outside.

I got some bad news this evening about a friend who I wish I had the time to get to know better. The person who delivered this news, another friend, filled me in and knew I wouldn’t give him cliches. Well, I believe he knew, now I’m sure he does.

Because of privacy and dignity of my friends, I’ll say no more, but it sets the mood. It’s dark. And it’s dark outside as I write this, though we humans and our fear of the dark makes the view a landscape of fear disguised as light. We don’t see as well at night, and rather than getting used to the dark, we used things to dispel the darkness.

Most of the time, what’s there in the dark is exactly what’s there in the light. We use light now out of fear of ourselves, mostly, because we’re our own worst predator second to time.

Away From Keyboard

I’ve spent a few days away from the computer. It started without a plan, and suddenly I found myself outside, pen in hand with a sketchbook. I don’t draw, I just like completely blank pages to graffiti on with my thoughts. Away from the keyboard, away from the links, away from being constantly tracked and anticipated by algorithms who don’t know the warmth of a human body.

The phone rang, I ignored it. Off and on I checked social media, mainly to check and see if the world had ended yet and I hadn’t gotten the memo.

Spoiler: The world has not ended yet.

It’s not for lack of trying though. When I say the world, by the way, I don’t mean our species. I mean the planet. People with bad hairstyles doing crazy things is not that new, despite what people think.

The planet won’t end before I will. It will change, maybe, where the fluids of our planet try to make it into a perfect globe. The winds, the waves, they weaponize time against the solids of the surface. It’s all much more interesting than reading stories I don’t like about people I don’t like doing things I don’t like in places I don’t like.

So I scribbled instead. Not poems. Not plans. Just fragments—like fossils of thoughts coaxed from tar pit of time.

Sitting out there, with no notifications and no blinking cursors, things made a bit more sense. Not in the way of answers, but in the way a breeze makes sense when you stop fighting the heat. The days went by quietly, the sun eventually forcing me from my roost later in the afternoon.

Nothing got ‘done’.

The planet, for now, keeps turning. And I keep sketching things that aren’t pictures.

Maybe that’s what passes for wisdom these days: Not knowing what you’re doing, but doing it away from the noise.

The Mundane, The Dull, The Undersung

A post from the Dull Men’s Club (Facebook) made itself into a glorious news story. ‘How did an Ayrshire bin end up in a German village?‘ was perhaps the most entertaining bit of news I had seen all week.

The group is full of people – men and women have separate groups, apparently, but people wander in regardless of gender. We find things, ask and answer questions about mundane things and have a pretty good sense of humor about it all.

There are, apparently, many of us that find joy in that. Through the group I get to see different parts of the world and even different ways of seeing the world through different cultures. It’s almost what the Internet should be.

Just a bunch of people solving everyday mysteries.

Share This Post For Wisdom.

A glowing human asking a digital oracle for guidance

Wisdom.

A society that only shares headlines doesn’t read articles. Congratulations. You’re not a member of that society.

If the only value you have is liking and sharing a post, then your value is determined by those that control you, those that want you to like and share things so that they may gain something from it. The Internet works best when we all bring something to it. For those of you actually out there and doing things, thank you.

We say that’s how we like to spend our time, but is it more like a last resort? Daydreaming is more fun. We have books on our shelves to read, or if not, we have books to find. We have a second per person per second, which stacks up pretty big in the billions. We should be decorating time somehow. That might be wisdom.

These days they say AI will help with that.

Spoiler alert: It won’t, not by present systems anyway.

Before AI, it was the IoT (Internet of Things), before the IoT it was the mobile phone, before the mobile phone it was the Internet, before the Internet was the PC Revolution, all promising us better lives. More productivity implying more personal time. It’s not a new thing to say.

Interfacing with a kludgy digital ecosystem that others profit from doesn’t make us more human – it makes us less. It turns us into the batteries of the Matrix, fueling itself and not putting enough back.

Maybe we should be more than that. That might be wisdom.

Decorating Time, II.

When I view the world, I view systems, in motion, with rhythms that dance with other systems, dancing within other systems, just… maybe humming when things are working right. There’s always something out of balance, and a light touch is enough to change it when it’s caught early enough.

Where so many are attracted to the explosions, the failures of systems, I am attuned to the efficiency of systems – the purr of a well tuned engine, the multi-threading of a real time system, a well orchestrated bit of music, and nature that sustains itself.

It’s the rare person that doesn’t like to see green around them in some shape and form for as far as the eye can see, or the ocean through the experience of a sailboat – not without that man made sound, but that wind being harnessed, ruined only by the shouts of coordination. There’s an indescribable pull to these things.

It is the same pull I feel when I watch a machine do precisely what it was designed to do, no more and no less. Not with violence, but with grace. A quiet sorting algorithm moving through millions of decisions without hesitation. A beam balanced perfectly across tension points. The kind of elegance that does not announce itself but is undeniable when you witness it. These things remind me that perfection is not loud. It does not need to be.

It shouldn’t have to be.

And yet, we seem drawn to the noise. Drawn to the spectacle of failure, to the sparks flying off misaligned gears. We watch systems crash and call it entertainment. We turn dysfunction into a kind of art. Somewhere along the line, it became more interesting to watch a thing break than to understand why it ever worked at all. Simplicity and balance are dismissed as boring, even as they quietly keep the world from falling apart.

But I cannot look away from balance. I cannot ignore the beauty of something that hums just under the surface of awareness. The kind of beauty you only notice when you stop needing to be entertained and start needing to understand. And once you see it, really see it, you start to wonder why we spend so much time chasing chaos, when the world is full of things quietly getting it right.

I see it less and less now, that beauty. It is not me, of that I am sure, for I have looked at myself through lenses of skepticism that dismantled my countenance into biases and reasons for biases and… so on, deep into the abyss where, oddly, the only thing you lose is time.

But that the orchestra of the world around me has changed. I understood the rhythms, the changes in the rhythms. Now it’s that I see systems failing, I see things failing, because we have built with technology that which the people controlling it only understand to break, to profit from the distraction, to accumulate so much that they themselves couldn’t spend if they tried.

From forests of data meeting the technological chainsaws to forests meeting the real ones, we seem so out of balance from when I started noticing. When I started trying to understand instead of being entertained.

And so, when they ask me if I will have the surgery, I hear it as another question entirely. Not about survival, but about whether I believe this system – this world we have built -is still one worth extending time within. Whether more heartbeats should be purchased for the sole purpose of watching the same predictable failures repeat on loop. The thought of living longer just to witness more of it, that endless stream of systems breaking under the weight of their own contradictions, feels less like a gift and more like a sentence.

But then I wonder if it is precisely because I see it failing that I should stay. Not to mend the whole, no, that is beyond any one person. But to tune what little corners I can still reach. To teach those still willing to listen that not every machine needs to grind itself into dust. That there is still music beneath the static if you know where to listen. Maybe the work is not to outlive the collapse, but to place one stone of balance amid the wreckage before I go.

It’s not looking good. It seems everyone is intent on making the fire bigger, the system more out of tune, in creating as much discord as they can.

So I make my decision the only way I know how. Not by asking how much time the surgery will buy me, but by asking what systems I might still steady with whatever time remains, and whether those systems are enough to regain some balance. And if the answer is yes, I suppose that is reason enough to let the heart keep its rhythm a little longer. Quietly, without announcement. Simply doing what it was designed to do.

Meanwhile, I’m counting vultures and toasting marshmallows.

Angiogram – Systems In Motion.

In viewing the angiogram, a few things snapped together, adding weight to the issue that most people would already have thought was heavy. I wasn’t in pain. I’m living a normal life. But having looked over the ECG and the echocardiogram findings, it was hard to reconcile in my mind these separate systems.

But the angiogram that I finally saw snapped it all together, sans lack of pain. I saw the full occlusion on one artery, the almost complete occlusions on the rest. I saw it all moving. Yet it bothered me that this was what added that weight? Why? This bothered me. I didn’t know why it had an effect.

I drilled down into it. Today it dawned on me that I was seeing 3 systems working in the video. That’s why.

Continue reading

Watch The World Burn (With Marshmallows)

An image of the world burning with a toasted marshmallow above it, held by the figurative hand of mankind.

I’m watching the world burn. I got marshmallows.

Every day, my news feed fills with what have to be bad jokes about where it’s going. Thus, I have found myself more and more as George Carlin described himself in this interview. He didn’t care anymore. He wasn’t emotionally invested in the outcome. He simply said what he said, tried to make the world a bit better with his work, and letting it go.

Recently, on some social media or the other, I wrote that while the Earth is burning and I can do nothing to change it, I can have marshmallows. In a comment on another post, I pointed out that people roasting marshmallows were more likely to be talked to than people who are shouting at people and calling them stupid. The ignorance does, indeed, burn, but if they are ignorant, it’s not really their fault, is it?

So hand them a marshmallow and stand by the fire. It’s the best opportunity you’ll have to remove the ignorance that is causing the world to burn.

The world is burning. Stop shouting. Go get the marshmallows.

The Vultures.

They ask how to escape.
But never why they are in the trap.

They ask how to win.
But never whether the game is worth playing.

The wrong question attracts the wrong answers.
And the longer you stay with the wrong question,
the more the wrong answers start to look like wisdom.

The vultures circle.
They do not need to attack.
They only need to wait.