Conditioning

Yesterday, before a medical appointment and later a friend, the electricity went away for a few minutes. Sitting at my desk, I felt a surge of adrenaline. My mind wanted me to do something, largely because generally speaking no one does anything where I live in Victoria Keyes other than complain about this or that or the other.

Over the years I had hopped into action, assessing the issue and communicating with everyone on WhatsApp, but since leaving the Board last week I have also left those chats. People, as they say, would have to paddle their own canoes. After all, recent events have me looking at my own well-being. I’ve done my part, from handling and communicating during issues to just putting up with some very self-centered griping from residents.

A Society Built On Averages

Title image for "Uncommon Talents: Gifted children, Prodigies and Savants" from 1998, Scientific American, by Ellen Winner

At the turn of the millennium, I read something that made so much sense to me that I built a bit of a world view on it.

At the time, my life was in upheaval as I chased this software engineering job and that, and I didn’t have time to flesh it out for others to understand. I couldn’t even remember what the article was, so when I did have time, I couldn’t refer back to it. Recently, after the heart attack and dealing with the bureaucracy of getting a triple bypass (no joy yet) I subscribed again and dived into the Scientific American archives. I found it.

The article is found in Scientific American1 Special Edition – 1998 Volume 09, No 4 – “Exploring Intelligence” – it’s written by Ellen Winner, and is titled “Uncommon Talents: Gifted Children, Prodigies and Savants”.

One of the interesting things raised by the article was – is – that society is not designed for outliers. In the great bell curve of society, society is designed for the majority– which is around the median.

Is It Worth Mimicking The Human Condition?

What does it mean to be human? We look for a collective answer to that question so often, and we never find it – maybe because there isn’t one.

If you look back in your past, you might remember doing something that felt so right. Maybe it was hitting a ball with a bat, maybe it was solving some sort of problem, maybe it was writing something down that suddenly clicked. Whatever it was, that’s a good indicator of who you are. You’re not limited to one thing, either. You can be as many things as you get those feelings from. It’s a tropism. It’s an orbit, sometimes elliptical, sometimes more round, something that you always gravitate towards. That’s the part of being you that also happens to be a part of being human – the stuff that feels right for you differs from what others may feel – but we all feel it in some way.

And then there’s the part of being human where you shake the tension off, rolling your shoulders as you stop feeling the weight and start feeling the strength that you had forgotten under the weight. Or that you walked so far that even as you sit you feel your legs still feel like they’re in motion. Of that feeling of the wind through one’s hair.

There’s a range of other emotions, too, that make us human and that we try to attribute to other creatures – happiness, sadness, anger… and all the shades in between and that lines that connect them.

A machine, no matter how clever, can’t do that. They can now, however, express that from simply scanning what more than 10,000 primates put on the internet because 0.1% of the primates don’t think the 10,000 matter more than they do other than as revenue streams. Oh, how I could warm to that topic…

AI can pretend to be us. But it will never be us. We’re a lot more fun to create than AI if you know how to do it right, and if you don’t, there are instructional videos on the Internet that demonstrate how not to do it.

Ethics Is Not A Solution, It’s a Framework, Silly

Over and over, I hear about something being ethical or unethical, or hear that ethics is some sort of solution. “That falls into ethics!”, someone will say, mentally wandering away from a conversation even as you stand there gaping at them.

Ethics, huh? It’s that thing we all think we have until we’re caught doing something we shouldn’t. Suddenly, we’re philosophers: ‘Well, it’s complicated.’ No, it’s not. It’s only complicated because you got caught. But since you’re here, let me walk you through it—one ethical system at a time. Prepare to feel morally superior for about five minutes before realizing you’ve broken most of these.

Continue reading

Modern Oracles: How AI and Technology Shape Our Uncertain Future

A glowing human asking a digital oracle for guidance
A glowing human asking a digital oracle for guidance

We humans have always loved our oracles. For thousands of years, we’ve sought their guidance—whether it was a priestess in Delphi inhaling sacred fumes or an oak tree whispering wisdom to a priest. Oracles promised to make sense of an unpredictable world, offering glimpses of the future and answers to our deepest questions. Who made those promises? We did.

Fast forward to today, and not much has changed. The world is as unpredictable as ever, and our need for guidance remains. But now, instead of visiting temples or deciphering omens, we consult technological oracles. For years, it was Yahoo, until Google dethroned it to become the omnipotent arbiter of answers. Now, the oracles have evolved into AI-powered models, capable of crafting essays, diagnosing illnesses, and even deciding who gets hired -or fired.

Yet these new oracles aren’t divine. They’re products of corporate greed, built by companies controlled by billionaires who are nothing like us. These modern seers don’t whisper truths; they process data – our data – fed to them by algorithms designed to maximize profits, not wisdom.

And we listen. We sacrifice jobs to these oracles in the name of progress, worrying about income and bills while chasing the next product a marketing team convinced us we couldn’t live without. It’s a vicious cycle, and we humans are its willing participants.

Maybe the problem isn’t the oracles themselves.

Maybe the problem is us—our relentless search for certainty in an uncertain world. After all, the oracle is just a mirror, reflecting back what we already know but don’t want to admit:

We’ve always been the creators of our own chaos.

How Relevant Are The Lenses We Look Through?

Shifting and exploring perspectives is one of the things I do a lot of. A lot of creativity and innovation, in my experience, comes from just that. I’ve thought of them as lenses that we look through – and how we look through them is defined by various modes of thought that we employ.

Let’s start with the lenses. We look toward the future through lenses scratched by the past – we can call the scratches ‘traumas’ in some contexts that give them a negative connotation, but in some contexts learning not to burn your hand on the stove is what I think is a necessary trauma.

Bias isn’t always error.

If we dare step out of our individual shells, we see things like this culturally as well. I’m pretty sure when a tribe got sick after someone showed up that didn’t belong to the tribe, they might consider anything foreign bad. Anyone that doesn’t look like them, doesn’t worship the same ‘God’, or… the list can go on. So we stare through that lense, culturally, wherever the accident of geography of birth placed us.

This in turn impacts the individual lens, which has a feedback loop to the cultural lens, and if you get a group of people who share the same view through the lens, it can create a subculture or if enough people are involved, can churn to become a part of the greater cultural lense.

When healthy, such lenses can keep people from harm.

When unhealthy, those lenses can be harmful not just to those who look through them but those who are looked at through them. Those that are looked at also look through lenses much the same. Perspectives can clash violently, which we’re seeing every day in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa – but it’s probably happening right outside your door.

One of the keys to understanding situations is being able to understand the lenses. How do you look at something? How does someone else? Why do you look at it that way? Why do they?

In this way, we sometimes find ourselves taking shortcuts again – they are evil, they are stupid, they are animals, etc. Once that happens these days, there’s bound to be violent change (but not necessarily violence) not too soon after, and more importantly, it keeps people from actually resolving whatever issues they have.

That doesn’t seem like it’s progress. So how do we fix that?

That seems like one of the biggest questions of humanity. I don’t have the answer and I would worry if someone said that they had one. In my own life, my experiences with this have had inconsistent results and I think that’s because sometimes being self-aware and mindful are not enough. Sometimes no matter how we try we’re looked at through lenses that we have no control over.

Maybe the trick is everyone understanding their own lenses, their own biases, but is it a bias if everyone around you looks through the same lens, as in an echo chamber? Not everyone will do that.

It begins with questioning our own beliefs in contexts outside of our comfort zone, maybe.