On Affirmative Action.

This is necessarily a touchy subject and one that I generally haven’t written much about despite how interesting it is to me. It’s a polarizing issue, and when issues get polarized the people in the middle generally get pushed against a wall and shot.

I don’t like being shot, really, but I’ve stewed on it.

Here’s the thing. I’m a tribe of one. My genetics come from a lot of people from all over the world that were productively sexual. A read on my genetics will link me to Genghis Khan, as an example, and I’m not Mongolian by any stretch. When it comes to prejudice, I have known many and none were actually about who I am but who I looked like.

I have never been judged on my genetics.

I have always been judged based on appearance. When I went to college so many years ago, the financial aid office had stuff for people of African descent, Native American, and even for people of Hispanic descent (it was just beginning)… but there I was, a guy with a West Indian version of an East Indian surname whose genetics included a slave trader, indentured laborer, a famous artist… the list goes on. My genealogy is a history of the world in some regards. The financial office had nothing special for me because I wasn’t black enough or hispanic enough. Later on I would find I might have claimed hispanic because of the Portugese of my great great grandmother, but even that would have been a stretch.

Affirmative action never helped me. When asked what ‘race’ I was, I always said, “other”, and when asked to explain, I simply put, “None of the above”. Affirmative action to me was just a thing where some people got a step up on the ladder and I had to climb it myself from the ground. It never bothered me because it was rare for me to find someone who didn’t merit that step up and I never understood tearing someone down to get ahead. Yet in a way, and this may sound horrible to some who are grounded in decades of affirmative action… affirmative action does much the same.

And.

It was also arguably necessary because of a bunch of racist policies at the time, so the argument that it was necessary is not something I will ever argue against. I have seen racism, I have even experienced it as someone mistaken for one group or another.

And.

Re-evaluating it’s necessity now is something we should consider. The grounding of affirmative action has been that people deserve opportunity based on merit, and there were those not getting that opportunity despite having the merit because of racism – racism, manufactured from the stupid human concept of ‘race’ which has no scientific basis whatsoever. If you send someone a copy of your DNA and nothing else, they cannot guess what you look like… yet? Maybe in the future, but not in the conceivable future.

I read the interview with Edward Blum, and it was not what I expected. It echoed my own sentiments, which I have kept to myself because I lacked enough knowledge. Affirmative action is a big red button I simply did not want to push because I’ve never benefited from it, and I was also aware that race was an issue. I was reminded every time I was mistaken for Mexican, Puerto Rican or Cuban, depending on facial hair, and even that is not a race. Even Latino is not a race. The diversity of those groups is astounding.

Just like ‘white people’. What is called ‘white’ wasn’t always considered ‘white’. The Europeans brought with them their own stigmas to the United States, and the Irish and Italians as examples were not considered ‘white’. Jews are Middle Eastern in origin themselves, they’re not ‘white’, and nowadays when we talk about ‘white’ we’re talking about some mix of European ancestries – unless you go to far East from Europe and start getting to the confusing areas where Asian and European merged thanks largely to the Mongol Empire.

What we do know is that if you stick two different people together, they have sex and their children are neither and both at the same time while becoming… unique.

That said, I’d suggest a read of this interview with Blum, and do so with an open mind. Look at the points he makes, the rebuttals, and consider it. If anything, it’s fodder for discussion.

Bigotry based on ‘race’ will eventually get screwed out of society, of that I’m sure, but in the interim, the next decades are what we need to look toward. Affirmative action as it stands may need to be looked into, not because we want to make things unfair, but because we do honestly want to make things fair for everyone.

Including mixed up genetic soups like me who make no claim to the major minorities. The answer is not more systemic bigotry, it’s less, and we need to take a hard look at that.

The Future 6 Years Ago.

Let’s time travel back to 2017 and read something.

Most jobs that exist today might disappear within decades. As artificial intelligence outperforms humans in more and more tasks, it will replace humans in more and more jobs. Many new professions are likely to appear: virtual-world designers, for example. But such professions will probably require more creativity and flexibility, and it is unclear whether 40-year-old unemployed taxi drivers or insurance agents will be able to reinvent themselves as virtual-world designers (try to imagine a virtual world created by an insurance agent!). And even if the ex-insurance agent somehow makes the transition into a virtual-world designer, the pace of progress is such that within another decade he might have to reinvent himself yet again…

The meaning of life in a world without work“, Yuval Noah Harari, The Guardian, 8th May 2017

We’re on the brink, and while Sundar Pichai may be using lawyers as examples, it stands to reason that there will be a shift in jobs of people who aren’t reading stuff like this to jobs where people… aren’t reading stuff like this.

It’s a really good article and worth exploring, since he condenses some ideas from his books nicely within it. Written 6 years ago, you’ll likely see that the future hasn’t changed that much in 6 years. It’s just gotten closer.

This is an existential thing for many jobs, but everyone is so busy working those jobs that they seem to have no time to notice. What are you doing to pay the bills, and how safe is it from the future?

Well, nothing’s safe from the future, but there are many jobs that will be safe. But there are many that won’t be. Worth considering before you turn on the television and plop on the couch.

Creativity, Education and Employment Simplified

If I Need Something, I'll Invent ItI’ve been thinking about creativity and technical stuff for… well, for most of my life. It was a few decades ago that I made peace with the two in the mind of a son of a poet and engineer.

It’s not complicated, but it continues to be unexplained by so many experts that I won’t bother linking them. And it is a real problem, as even NASA scientists have found.

In one paragraph:

Creativity is basically not thinking like other people do. Education systems create standardized ways of thinking.

Right there is the answer. Albert Einstein alluded to it frequently, speaking of levels of thinking that solve problems being different than the level that created them, or about imagination, etc.

So, in an education system – in any system – you see creativity in outliers. People who don’t think like everyone else are considered creative even when they themselves may not consider themselves creative.

And that is where things get complicated. If everyone approaches problems the same way, they are measured the same way in education and employment systems (the two are almost the same these days)… are we surprised that creativity diminishes within the systems?

Maybe the cause of that surprise is the education system. After all, people studying the systems are byproducts of the systems and are using the standardized tools to study things in the hope to find how to become… less standard.

This is why we should laugh at the world more.