Summarize This.

I was about to fire up Scrivener and get back to writing the fictional book I’m working on and I made the mistake of checking my feeds.

In comes Wired with, “Scammy AI-Generated Book Rewrites Are Flooding Amazon“. On Facebook, I had noticed an up-tick of ‘wholesale’ ebooks that people could sell on their own, but I thought nothing of it other than, “How desperate do you need to be?”.

It ends up it has been a big problem in the industry for some time, people releasing eBooks and having summaries posted on Amazon within a month, especially since large language models like ChatGPT came out. Were the copyrighted works in the learning models?

How does that happen? There are some solid examples in the article, which seem to be mainly non-fictional works.

…Mitchell guessed the knock-off ebook was AI-generated, and her hunch appears to be correct. WIRED asked deepfake-detection startup Reality Defender to analyze the ersatz version of Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans, and its software declared the book 99 percent likely AI-generated. “It made me mad,” says Mitchell, a professor at the Santa Fe Institute. “It’s just horrifying how people are getting suckered into buying these books.”…

Scammy AI-Generated Book Rewrites Are Flooding Amazon“, Kate Knibbs, Wired.com, Jan 10th, 2024

I think that while some may be scammed, others just want to look smart and are fed the micro-learning crap that’s going around where they can, ‘listen to 20 books in 20 days’. I have no evidence that they’re doing summaries, but it seems like the only way someone could listen to 20 books in 20 days. I’d wondered about the ‘microlearning’ stuff, since I have spent a fair amount of time tuning my social media to allow me to do ‘microlearning’ when I am on social networks.

What is very unfair is that some of those books have years of research and experience in them. It’s bad enough that Amazon takes a big chunk out of the profits- I think it’s 30% of the sales – but to have your book summarized within a month of publishing is a bit too much.

Legally, apparently, summaries are legal to sell because it falls under fair use, though exceptions have happened. This is something we all definitely need to keep an eye on, because of the writers I know who bleed onto pages, nobody likes parasites.

And these people clogging Amazon with summaries are parasites.

If you’re buying a book, buy the real thing. Anyone who has actually read the book won’t be fooled by you reading or listening to a summary for long, and there are finer points in books that many summaries miss.

Ecosystem Research: pH, gH, kH.

I’ve been doing some research for something I am writing, and it became apparent that I needed to have a bit more in depth knowledge about ecosystems and so on. So I set about starting a planted aquarium where I could add ammonia and feed the plants through that process. The ‘why’ of it is simply research.

P1010005//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js

In doing this, I went out, got a tank, etc, and of course everyone assumes I’m going to put fish in it. The idea of simply having plants in a tank of water hardly seems of worth to pet shop owners that sell aquariums, but I have my reasons.

Now, for those of you new to aquariums, there are things like pH you have to monitor, and if you’re on Earth instead of snooping from a distant planet or spaceship, you’ll need to understand that the nitrogen cycle must be started. Plants need food to create oxygen and carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. All the guides on this, as you would expect, tend toward having fish in the aquarium mainly so that they can poo, but it can be done with household ammonia. If I were planning to put fish in the tank, I’d probably start the cycle with ammonia anyway, particularly after what I have learned so far.

What I found was that my tank’s pH was 8.4, which is extraordinarily high and bad for fish – 7.8 is the high end of where plants are fine except, perhaps, some plants I am unfamiliar with. 6.5, by the way, is the low end.

So now, the trick is to reduce the pH. As a novice at this – thus the research – I go, get some aquarium stuff to lower the pH, and try it out. No dice. So rather than spend a bunch of money, try vinegar. No effect. Check the input water and find a high pH – aha! Check the filter on that tap, aha! Full of gunk. Address, partial water changes, repeat.

See, what most experienced people don’t talk about to novices is kH – carbonate hardness. The carbonates act as a buffer against the acid, and a high kH means that there is less likely to be a pH swing since addition of acidic content simply can make a high kH aquarium giggle like a pleased young mermaid. And this was the real issue I was dealing with.

And then on top of all of this, there is the general hardness (gH) which has to do with magnesium and calcium ions in the water. When aquarium fish are said to enjoy ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ water, this is a reference to gH.

A week ago, I knew none of this. But the interrelations in the ecosystem with such basic chemistry are exactly why I’m doing the research – pH, kH and gH form a triad related to the nitrogen cycle in an ecosystem, so already this is a worthwhile endeavor.

It also gets you thinking about other things when you sit in your writing area. It makes you think about people, and how they can have their own pH, kH and gH. And that is an even more derivative thought worthy of exploring in quiet moments in the writing area.