Categories Schmategories.

When I read “Genres as Crushers of Creativity” by Jude Berman, I was happy.

I hate categories, and to read someone else talking about how categories in the publishing industries crushes creativity, I was tempted to find a parking lot to dance naked in until I realized people might not appreciate that sight as much as I might enjoy doing it.

So judgemental, humans.

Maybe it’s because of my own identity not fitting neatly into someone else’s category, maybe it’s because I connect things differently than most people seem to. Maybe it’s just not enjoying the prejudices that come with categories.

“Oh, you’re a software engineer, will you fix my computer?”
“It can’t reproduce, it’s already fixed. Unless… well, we won’t discuss that.”

When it comes to blogging, as an example, I have been around 2 decades and I’m heading toward 3. I’ve written about a lot of things, some popular, some not. Douglas Adams once wrote that a nerd is someone who uses a phone to talk to other people about phones, and by that measure the Internet itself is nerdy. We use the Internet to… talk about the Internet.

Yet there’s much more to us. When the ‘blogging tips’ started coming out in the late 1990s and early 2000s, I rolled my eyes and just wrote about whatever I wanted to write about, writing in a niche be damned. We have tags for that stuff. I can write about topics that touch each other sensually or violently that way, and go about my business.

Did I make lots of money doing that? Nope. Not yet anyway. I suppose I would need a business plan of some sort, and that’s not in the cards right now as I keep writing unpublished books, waiting for this AI business to settle down. People find my stuff, they read it, they like it or not, and maybe their world is a little bit better for it. Someone liking or commenting on something that I wrote makes me smile, even if they disagree because it means it provoked thought. Negative emotions are running rampant around the planet, and those conversations are best to be avoided.

When we write – those of us that do beyond short missives to the ether of microblogging – we write to an audience. When I think of the writing that connected with me over the years, the scratching of pens on paper, the tapping of old typewriters, it was as if the author was opening worlds for me beyond time, beyond space, and even beyond death. To flatten the perspectives into simple categories seems silly to me.

Take for example the connection between Toni Morrison and Information Science I wrote about recently – she connected two things and made a very human point. That, to me, is what people who write do – they connect things in human ways, and in a period of technology we forget that. Technology is useless to us unless it empowers us and our ability to connect with other humans – nevermind the AI girlfriends, a disturbing trend if every I saw one.

We get to define the walls that contain who we are. Don’t write for categories. Write for yourself, be it a blog or a book. Or stay in a lane someone else defined for you and eventually wonder why you can’t break out.

Reading Write.

Throughout my younger years, as a student, whenever the book list came out for the next year and it had literature, I would read all the literature books over the course of the summer before school started again, and then I would read whatever else I could find.

My father’s novels were pilfered of their words, from Robert Ludlum to Louis L’amour to James Clavell to… well, he didn’t read as quickly as I, and soon enough I was reading his engineering texts, or randomly flipping through the encyclopedias that were in the bookshelf of the office of the print shop. I was tasked to find typos often enough, reading what others had written. Every word expanded my universe that much more, even though I was locked in a prison of someone else’s house in my mind. Every sentence was a slide of escape, every paragraph a rocket that took my mind elsewhere.

When the PC revolution was happening, we got a PC in the print shop and what I read changed. I found myself reading DOS manuals, BYTE magazine, Compute! magazine, and all sorts of other things because the future was exciting and it smelled like books. There was an article I remember – I think it was in a BYTE magazine – and it spoke of hypertext, and I thought this would be a wonderful thing because when I was reading I sometimes would have to venture to a dictionary or thesaurus when I encountered something alien to me. Hypertext, I thought, would be awesome – and decades later, the only website that truly uses hypertext the way that article described is Wikipedia.

For about a decade, all I read were various versions of tech manuals, programming language manuals, hardware manuals and a lot of game programming manuals because, back then, an individual could write a game for a PC. Programming allowed me to exercise my knowledge through experimentation, about how to collate information in different ways. My grades weren’t great in school because the syllabus didn’t have interesting stuff, mostly, and the science syllabus was more of a leash than an exploration.

It was only when I returned to that same house a decade and a half later that I started reading literature again, thanks to Gutenberg.org. Friends had tried to get me to read literature prior, but I was busy working as a software engineer and needed to stay not just current but in a lot of ways prescient. When working in that field, at least at the time, one had to always build new skills and new ways of doing things.

The whole process was a process of growth, and what you read had a lot to do with that, and so I fell behind on all the stuff about being human and had to catch up. Every book, though, added value because it gave me parts of an expanding universe in my mind to draw upon, and when I wrote I drew upon them too, even in technical documentation for my own amusement.

The process of getting the knowledge had value because every book filled me with new questions to press on with – something I noted many people educated did not do, since they had attained their degrees and were satisfied. They stopped in place, some of them, and simply did what was required. They may have been educated, but some of them had stopped learning, something which I do not understand to this day. How can someone be satisfied with unanswered questions?

The world is full of questions unasked, answers untold, and each question answered gives new questions.

We read. We write. To write, we have to read more than we write, but unlike a generative AI, we internalize it and compare it to our own experiences as a human being, and as our experiences grown the same books can hold different questions and answers.

I wonder at a world full of people who do not understand this.

The Lost Art of Browsing.

It disturbs me a little that there are people out there right now that have never physically browsed books, or music.

I would spend a lot of time in particular wandering bookstores, looking for things to read. Harold Bloom’s quote comes to mind; “We read, frequently if not unknowingly, in search of a mind more original than our own.”

In the 1980s, I would frequent a bookstore in Trinidad – Manhin’s – on High Street in San Fernando, checking to see if the new Byte magazine, Compute! magazine, etc, would show up and when I did, I invariably picked up other books. It was never time wasted and, even if I didn’t buy some of the books, browsing them made me aware of other aspects of the world. Neil deGrasse Tyson pitches it to businesses as not making as much money if people cannot browse, but the benefit for the consumer is not that businesses can make more money but that consumers can get things that they want or need.

Thrift stores were a special kind of fun for me, before Walmart took over the United States, because you could find some really good stuff in them – including books, books that were cherished by someone, books that were kept on a bookshelf over years and sometimes decades because to them, there was something important in that book that they wanted to be able to revisit.

That seems lost now. In fact, bookstores have become more like Amazon with ordering specific books to sell based on what is popular when I’ve found some of the most interesting books aren’t popular. It used to be that you would walk into a bookstore, the smell of paper and ink permeating the place- some that traded in used novels smelled of old newsprint paper – and you got a feeling that you might find something. A good book found was like an archaeological find in an excavation.

Largely, we’ve lost that. Algorithms have taken away the discovery of our ‘B-Sides’, and feeding artificial intelligences on our habits, likes and dislikes, leaving our lives to be victimized by our options not just in politics but in everything. Everything is marketed, everything about our habits of looking are tracked and recorded, implicitly telling us we should be what we were instead of what we could become.

Being Human in 2024

There has been a lot going through my mind these past few weeks as I attempted to get the pitter-patter of the fingerprints across the keyboard.

I gave up for a while and decided to just be a human being for a while, not someone who has been writing books that became other books that sat while other books have started and others are just waiting for that magical ending that has not coalesced.

One of the things that haunted me was trying to figure out what’s next in a world where anything I write might be in a training model for an AI. I wonder if people who have been using Grammarly realized they were training AI. I doubt it, but WordPress.com is not immune and is something I’ll be writing about today on KnowProSE.com.

I’ve lived a bit over half a century. I grew up with 8 track tapes, vinyl records and reel-to-reel, only to have that upended by cassettes, only to have that upended by CDs, only to have that upended by MP3s and FLAC (the latter being better). At each turn I bought the music again not because I didn’t have it but because I didn’t have it in the format that my stereos could play it in. The music industry alone leeched probably tens of thousands of dollars from my income because I like my music. This shift in technology is something newer generations bypassed, but my generation did not have the opportunity. We bore the financial weight of such changes in technology.

With video, we went from VHS and Betamax to laserdiscs to bluray to… well, I’m not that much into movies. Computer use in my time went from actual floppy discs that were 10″ across to the USB sticks we have now that have exponentially more memory than the computers we once had.

Phones went from per minute charges on landlines to mobile phones with rates for text messages (SMS) and voice calls by the minute that we have now.

A lot has happened. I have a 53″ flat screen television that wouldn’t have worked in the 1970s because my mother couldn’t put stuff on top of it.

All I wanted to do at this age was sit around and write books and this new AI technology has distracted me from it, as well as made me wonder if it’s still a good plan. Amazon gets flooded with book summaries that rip off what others have spent years researching.

This was all sufficient enough to take some time to consider because that’s a lot to consider. The self-inflicted leaders of technology don’t really give a shit about my existence other than as a revenue stream. I don’t matter to them. This I know. Should I matter to them? Should you?

I wondered for a while if I had become a Luddite because it does bother me that what I have spent a lifetime learning is what I write about, each sentence and paragraph a distillation of decades of being a human being. Generative AI spitting out text for people who ask it questions is competition now, in a world where genuine human content is as surreal as the best written fiction. Is it dystopian? Is it utopian? That really depends on how we view the world, and how others in the world view us.

It is important that we keep being human, I think. I’m just not very certain what that is supposed to be. Fortunately, I just have to be myself, but I do have to know where the boundary is between who I am and what people do with what I create.

Summarize This.

I was about to fire up Scrivener and get back to writing the fictional book I’m working on and I made the mistake of checking my feeds.

In comes Wired with, “Scammy AI-Generated Book Rewrites Are Flooding Amazon“. On Facebook, I had noticed an up-tick of ‘wholesale’ ebooks that people could sell on their own, but I thought nothing of it other than, “How desperate do you need to be?”.

It ends up it has been a big problem in the industry for some time, people releasing eBooks and having summaries posted on Amazon within a month, especially since large language models like ChatGPT came out. Were the copyrighted works in the learning models?

How does that happen? There are some solid examples in the article, which seem to be mainly non-fictional works.

…Mitchell guessed the knock-off ebook was AI-generated, and her hunch appears to be correct. WIRED asked deepfake-detection startup Reality Defender to analyze the ersatz version of Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans, and its software declared the book 99 percent likely AI-generated. “It made me mad,” says Mitchell, a professor at the Santa Fe Institute. “It’s just horrifying how people are getting suckered into buying these books.”…

Scammy AI-Generated Book Rewrites Are Flooding Amazon“, Kate Knibbs, Wired.com, Jan 10th, 2024

I think that while some may be scammed, others just want to look smart and are fed the micro-learning crap that’s going around where they can, ‘listen to 20 books in 20 days’. I have no evidence that they’re doing summaries, but it seems like the only way someone could listen to 20 books in 20 days. I’d wondered about the ‘microlearning’ stuff, since I have spent a fair amount of time tuning my social media to allow me to do ‘microlearning’ when I am on social networks.

What is very unfair is that some of those books have years of research and experience in them. It’s bad enough that Amazon takes a big chunk out of the profits- I think it’s 30% of the sales – but to have your book summarized within a month of publishing is a bit too much.

Legally, apparently, summaries are legal to sell because it falls under fair use, though exceptions have happened. This is something we all definitely need to keep an eye on, because of the writers I know who bleed onto pages, nobody likes parasites.

And these people clogging Amazon with summaries are parasites.

If you’re buying a book, buy the real thing. Anyone who has actually read the book won’t be fooled by you reading or listening to a summary for long, and there are finer points in books that many summaries miss.

Beyond Children’s Books.

I came across Let the Kids Get Weird: The Adult Problem With Children’s Books on LitHub.com and immediately thought of Andrea, Children’s Book Illustrator, mainly because she’s someone who does deal with children’s books. Her illustrations I particularly enjoy, because they’re playful in ways that the article mentions.

“…We reckon with our shadows in middle-age, according to the literature of psychoanalysis, a time when we may find ourselves ensconced in the children’s literature scene. Picture a middle-aged author wrestling their own existential fear of death while writing a bedtime story about bunnies: Writing good children’s fiction as an adult is hard.

“It’s hard not to get entangled in the collective consciousness, in simplistic moralism, in projections of various kinds, so that you end up with your baddies and goodies all over again,” wrote Le Guin. We toggle between confronting children with the reality of the world (note the bleak realm of climate fiction for young readers) and with blanketing them in fluffy chickens.

“The young creature does need projection. But it also needs the truth,” LeGuin wrote…”

Janet Manley, Let the Kids Get Weird: The Adult Problem With Children’s Books, July 17th, 2023

If that’s not a fair description of a generation gap, I don’t know what is. It’s something I’ve noticed a problem with myself, not because my nieces and nephews got older but because a part of me has remained younger than them in this regard, if that makes any sense to you.

I just slid up the same scale, but life for them has been different with a different start in the world in a different world. To write anything for anyone, to communicate anything to anyone, you have to first pull them into the world you see. To do that, you need to understand how they see the world, find the parts they like, reach in and grab them, then describe your world around them.

Since I don’t write children’s books, I never thought of this in that way. I’ve never actually purchased a book for my niece’s and nephews, though I may have given them some of mine over time in an attempt to grow a perspective closer to mine to handle a life hurdle. Life’s hurdles can be hard with the wrong mindset, I know.

Looking back, I didn’t buy children’s books because they already had too many. Apparently, every niece and nephew I had at that age was a voracious reader according to their parents at the time, but they did not remain so – and I wonder how much of that love of books was simply love of time spending with their loved one. I did not have such time that I remember, but memory is fleeting and fragmented. So if that’s the case, are you selling children’s books or building relationships with people who influence the children?

That’s not a bad thing by a stretch. The article talks about selling books that grandmothers would buy for children, and I’m not sure that’s a bad thing either. Helping build a relationship between a grandparent and child seems like a worthwhile task for anyone.

Yet.

I do agree with the article in that children also need the space to imagine beyond what is there, to be weird and goofy with what is there, and building a relationship with themselves. A book shelf of books for reading with grandma when grandma dies is a book shelf of reasons not to read again, a painful association, at least for a period. There needs to be a mix on that shelf.

I probably wouldn’t have even looked at the article had I not been following Andrea. She has been dragging me into her world and describing it to me, I suppose.

Murakami On The Elevator

As I got home, walking to the elevator, I was still pondering the fun, “Which came first, the purse or the lack of pockets?” question in my mind. I don’t really want to know the answer, it’s just fun to consider.

Not everything needs answers.

I’d given up coming up with theories on the ffft-ffft lady.

Not everything has answers.

On the way there, my trains of thought – I never have just one train going – were interrupted by some friendly faces. A newly married couple, I know he sells insurance and is generally a nice guy, while his new wife is still a bit of a mystery to me. She’s nice, polite, and likes coffee, which makes her a better human being than him in my eyes.

He doesn’t drink coffee. That seems sinful after all the wars and empires involved in bringing coffee from Ethiopia to the rest of the world, but what I consider sinful is subjective.

We have polite conversation, and going up in the elevator, he spots my book. I had returned home early because I was thinking of meaning and wanted to get that writing done and didn’t want to get lost in another group of trains of thought, so I had my receipt from the coffee shop sticking out from the pages.

“What are you reading?”, he asks.

“Oh, some Murakami. I haven’t read this book in some years and decided to revisit it.”, I respond.

His eyes blank, he has nowhere to go with that. It’s not something that is standard fare in Trinidad and Tobago, I suppose, so I try to be helpful.

“It’s where that quote about the storm comes from. How when you come out of the storm you’re never the same as when you went in.”

This, according to his facial expression, did not help either, but the idea began to toss around in his head.

“OK”, he says, as I exit the elevator. He never struck me as a reader, but then most of the literati in Trinidad and Tobago have an insane focus on the Caribbean and Caribbean authors, enough so that in some ways Trinidad and Tobago is a tidal pool, where ideas wash in mainly from distilled island authors.

At least that’s my experience, what I have observed, and it’s purely anecdotal. To me, though, if you have not read Haruki Murakami, you’re missing a bit of life.

Suddenly, as I unlocked my door, I laughed to myself.

I had just done an elevator pitch of, “Kafka on the Shore” without even knowing it.

I hate elevator pitches.

Bookstores and Libraries.

I’m an explorer of sorts. I don’t wander around planting flags, but I do wander around and see what I can. I’ve traveled when it was easier to do so, and I still will as I can – but international traveling has become such an annoyance.

There was a time when we didn’t have to take off our shoes and belts at airports, kids, or do digital X-ray pornography for the TSA. In that regard, terrorism won.

Books allow me to keep my belt and shoes on and don’t care how much toothpaste I have in my carry on.

I don’t know how it will be with future generations. Everyone seems too busy chattering away, but I fully expect that when the memes age all that will be left are memories of the Internet detritus. When they get to my age, will they be asking each other if they remember that meme?

For me, I absorb books. I revisit some every few years and sometimes find in the revisiting new things based on what I take with me into the book.

Good books are like that. Good books are worth keeping on a bookshelf as a reference. Good books can be dusty but not dated.

I like books. It’s part of how we distill ideas. I regularly go to bookstores in the hope that I’ll find something worth reading, and only now and then do I find something. Trinidad and Tobago doesn’t seem to be a big market for books and the bookstores reflect that, maybe.

I do miss wandering through a Waldenbooks, or Barnes and Nobles, or any physical bookstore. I’ve spent more time in libraries than in the education system at this point, I’m pretty sure. To me, there’s little that’s better than being surrounded by books.

I was over at Bookshop.org leafing through future books to read. I’m even putting together a little booklist because… well, I was goofing off. It’s not about commissions, it’s about encouraging people to read good books. Commissions generally suck on affiliate sites, and since they are using Stripe, it’s unlikely I’ll be able to collect anything anyway.

Some of my old stuff links to Amazon.com, but they have a stupid policy about affiliate links and accounts. If you happen to move across drawn lines on maps, they require you to have a separate account – and as a digital nomad, that simply doesn’t work very well.

It’s not about commissions. It’s about the ideas in those books and making sure people have a chance to access them easily. If a book is available legally for free, I’m going to point to them.

Project Gutenberg is chock full of books people can get for free, as an example, but erosion of public domain means books that would be available for free before all the Copyright changes are… not. We’ve lost that battle, a battle fought when most people were busy paying attention to other things.

If I refer to a book, it’s because I think it’s worth reading, not worth selling you. You can get it any way you wish, and I’d encourage you to do so – especially at your local library.

Grab the ISBN number, or just the author’s name and the title, and go forth. There are some good ideas out there we need to keep moving through time.

Go visit your local library anyway.

The Bookstore

Rain. Bookstore. I read the Glad well before, but find myself referencing when I don't have a copy.I’d needed a haircut for a few days, but the stylists – whatever you wish to call them – were having bouts of the flu. Today, though, I called and faced the traffic to get there, to have my hair cut – and the lady in charge was kind enough to throw in a complimentary shampoo. The shampoo involved a head massage by a woman I can only describe as gifted.

I was in a good mood. It was rainy. I did not want to go home; a lady asks me if I was hungry – a hint that I was boggled at to the point where I fumbled it. I left, and went to a place I am always comfortable. A bookstore.

In entering, I was immediately asked if I needed help. I said no, and began perusing titles – I liked the Louis L’amour, I always have, so I picked that up because I hadn’t read these stories by the dead author. Some will point out that he wasn’t the best Western writer, talking about how his publishers made sure his books were prominent… I don’t know. I do know that my father purchased all of them, that a Louis L’amour novel lasts me about 4 hours at most, but that I always enjoy them.

Another young woman comes up to me and asks me if I need help. I said no again.

A few more minutes perusing. Looking for minds more original than my own has become difficult; I scan titles and look at cover art. I read the back covers, instantly annoyed at how marketers have taken over that spot to tell people what other people have said about the book.

I don’t give a shit what anyone else says about the book, I want to know what the book is about.

And… a young man comes up to me and asks me if I need help. I stare at him. “You’re the third.”

“What?”

“The third person who asked me if I needed help. I don’t understand why. If I’m in a bookstore and I need help, I probably shouldn’t be in a bookstore.” I said this maybe a little more annoyed than I should have, but I let it sink in a moment. This attempt to play librarian in a bookstore forgets that the librarian sits quietly until provoked; the librarian doesn’t go around asking people, “Do you need help?”

I scan titles I’ve seen easily in the background as I considered the plight of the young man.

“Look, I’m sorry, you didn’t deserve that and you’re doing your job as your employer says you should – and maybe even as the market dictates. So I apologize. It’s just that I know my way around the bookstore, I like the joy of finding things I couldn’t possibly tell you about because I don’t know them yet.”

He accepts the apology, but I see that my former words had stung more than my latter words had soothed. He wanted to explain. I let him, let him let the ooze rip from the cyst I had accidentally incised with my words, nodding at moments, keeping eye contact, but flipping through the books I had scanned in my mind. He needed to let go of something, I didn’t need to hear it. His face relaxed. He was done. I smiled, nodded and said, “I think I understand” and continued looking over the shelves of books.

The young woman who had asked me if I needed help first witnessed the exchange. She assured me he was fine, but her assurance didn’t mean he was fine. He was sensitive. People had been nice to me today. Part of me wanted to shout at him to toughen up, the other part regretted my casual abrasiveness. The latter won this time.

Most of the books were ancient in the age of the Internet; a point of anguish for me sometimes, but also a time of opportunity to see some of how the roots of present ideas form. I read very, very fast – not ‘speedreading’. I just read fast and have a reading comprehension that frustrates me to no end when people with degrees are so bad at it. So, while the books are generally what’s sent and left in this tropical armpit of the planet, where books come to die, there are opportunities to explore things – with the knowledge that the information in them is likely outdated. It’s better than reading ingredients on soup cans.

I peruse some more, finding the Gladwell that I so often tried to use as a reference for some of the solid concepts he has written about – but I had left my copy in Trinidad the first time I had left, had left the copy I had in Florida, and was down here without a copy. And I picked up one on the rise and fall of information empires — something that I’m constantly researching new perspectives on (because none of them truly fit). I explore more, seeing the same tired titles that no one wanted yet.

I encounter the young woman I had first met upon entering the store – she’s nestled quietly in a corner with a book, reading.

“Ahh, that’s exactly what I would be doing if I worked here.” Nothing makes a literate person more comfortable than seeing the person working there reading instead of pestering them, in my mind, but we’ve already established I’m an outlier (gratuitous Gladwell reference).

She looks up and smiles, “I love working here. I get to read.” Well, look at this – a rare bird in this day and age, the Literati Exoticus.

She looks at the books in my hand, “I see you found some things. Why did you choose them?”

So I go through, explaining, “Well, the Louis L’amour is like cocaine to read; it’s fast, action packed, well paced and unfortunately over quickly leaving you wanting more. The Gladwell is something I like to refer to when writing, but I don’t have a copy so I’m getting this one. And this one is about Information Empires, which I’m interested in because I find myself writing about them indirectly.”

“You’re a writer?”

“Ugh. I wrote an eBook that got published back in 2005 or 2006. I wasn’t pleased with it, but yes, I’ve been published and I do write… though I haven’t published a book since then.”

“Why not?”

“Partly things changing so fast, partly procrastination and all the excuses not to write, and partly too many projects I’ve started and not finished.”

“I want to write children’s books.”

“Then write one.”

“I’m procrastinating.”

We laugh. In conversation she points to the bookshelf next to her as a generic reference to books and accidentally points at “50 Shades of Grey”. I laugh, telling her what she pointed at – and looking around to see that the store was empty of other customers, went on to say, “That book is so horribly written.”

Enter sensitive Third, who apparently loves the book. I try to make the distinction, “I’m not saying it’s a bad book… I’m saying it’s horribly written.” An attempt to be honest without being dishonest to smooth over the sting. This poor guy looked like someone kept walking by and killing puppies. I decided that there was nothing to be done, that I had been kind enough, that part of growing up was facing facts and that the “my puppy died” face was just to trigger enablers.

Fuck enablers. I’ve seen too many make children of what could have been men in my generation and prior. There’s a place for sensitivity, but there’s that thin line.

“Listen, it’s a popular book, but being popular doesn’t mean it’s well written. In fact, the BDSM community came out against the book. Writers mock the book openly. But people buy it, just like people think McDonalds sells hamburgers.”

His eyes grow distant, as if I had also killed puppies in the distance. Or maybe he was sad yet thoughtful. It’s not my business, my business is being honest and, at times, hurting feelings – conscientiously, for ‘the greater good’.

I bought my books, having made a friend of one person there and having killed a few virtual puppies of the other – a shame because if the puppies were real, I’d probably still be playing with them. Who doesn’t like puppies?

Exited stage, left.