The “That’s Not It” Sea Story.

This is one of my favorite sea stories.

There was this sailor who walked around on the deck of a ship, picking up any piece of paper he found and looking at it seriously for a moment. He would then toss it, saying barely audibly, “That’s not it.”

He was counseled about it by his Chief, and when the Chief handed him the paperwork to sign for the counseling, he looked at the paper a moment and said, “that’s not it.” and threw it to the deck.

Flustered, the Chief sent the sailor to the sick bay to see the Doc, and the Doc checks him out. He pulls out the Rorscharch test cards to see what the young sailor had to say he saw, and every card just caused the young sailor to shake his head and say, “That’s not it.”

The Doc talked to the Captain, and the Captain decided to have him go to see Psych when they got back to shore, confining the sailor to quarters for the interim. Months later, the same thing played out on shore at Psych. “That’s not it.”, over and over again.

Finally the Navy decided to discharge him, so he went to the Personnel Department where they had his discharge papers. The Yeoman pushed them across the desk, telling the sailor to read and sign.

The sailor diligently read the pages, nodded, and said, “That’s it!”.

He whipped out a pen and signed the paperwork.

He was stoic, and held out for what he wanted – and got it.

The Sperm Whale Throat Sea Story.

As a young non-commissioned officer, this was one of my favorites not because it pulled rank, but because it pointed out accepting reality is necessary. A Master Chief told me this and it stuck – I was trying to buck the system somehow, as if the system would suddenly change because of my wishes. I was, of course, wrong, but that’s part of being a young NCO.

He looked at me, deadpan, after a moment of silence, and asked me, “Do you know what the size of a sperm whale’s throat is?”.

I, of course, didn’t know.

He held up his hands palm outward, his thumbs and forefingers from each hand touching, and pushed them out toward me. “This big. Do you know why?”

“No Masterchief”

He pushed his hands out at me with every word, and said slowly and firmly, “Because that’s the way it is.”

And verily, that was the way it was. Petty Officer Rampersad wasn’t going to change it by himself. Better to accept it and move on.

There’s some wiggle room here. We should question things at times, buts sometimes we don’t have the luxury of time for navel-gazing, particularly in the military, so sometimes you just accept that things are the way they are and move on. If it’s not a hill you want to die on, don’t.

Connecting Dots.

When you read a lot, you find connections. I recently found an example of this through the Marginalian, with the article “The Source of Self-Regard: Toni Morrison on Wisdom in the Age of Information1.

We could all use a bit of wisdom in the Information Age.

The quote she pulled that got me interested was by Toni Morrison, who was many good things but was not an information scientist – yet she got to the crux of much of information science in her quote, with a difference.

The full quote, which can be found in a copy of “The Source of Self-Regard” online free here, is:

For the purposes of the rest of this talk I want us to agree that in all of our education, whether it’s in institutions or not, in homes or streets or wherever, whether it’s scholarly or whether it’s experiential, there is a kind of a progression. We move from data to information to knowledge to wisdom. And separating one from the other, being able to distinguish among and between them, that is, knowing the limitations and the danger of exercising one without the others, while respecting each category of intelligence, is generally what serious education is about. And if we agree that purposeful progression exists, then you will see at once how dispiriting this project of drawing or building or constructing fiction out of history can be, or that it’s easy, and it’s seductive, to assume that data is really knowledge. Or that information is, indeed, wisdom. Or that knowledge can exist without data. And how easy, and how effortlessly, one can parade and disguise itself as another. And how quickly we can forget that wisdom without knowledge, wisdom without any data, is just a hunch.

Toni Morrison, “The Source of Self-Regard“, 2019

I was floored by this because she connected data to information to knowledge… to wisdom, which is something you see as the DIKW (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom) pyramid in Information Science. Gobs and gobs of data make up information, gobs and gobs of information make up knowledge… and gobs and gobs of knowledge gives you wisdom.

Maybe. We hope, anyway. It takes a lot of data to make information, and information is basically purposed data – we look into a cloud of data and try to make sense of it within a context. Information, in turn, is purposed information, which builds knowledge. The elusive wisdom comes from knowledge.

With that simple quotation from her book – and it’s a great book, I read it before writing this – she connected it all to we humans in a very human way. That’s one of the gifts great writers have. I recognized it because I’ve read much on information science and thought much about it, but maybe a lot of people who read Toni Morrison haven’t but she’s exposed them to it.

Maybe more people who are well read on information science will read more Toni Morrison.

Maybe that’s a path from some knowledge to some wisdom.

  1. If you don’t read the Marginalian, I strongly suggest you do. Maria Popova’s managed to do what I had originally intended to do with KnowProSE.com in her own flavor, and she’s worth subscribing to. You can also ma*********@in******.social “>follow the Marginalian on Mastodon here. ↩︎

The Warrior-Philosopher

I like quotations, and on Facebook I’ve attentuated my stream as best I could to provide me with thoughtful quotations and other interesting stuff despite the troublesome algorithms.

A quote caused a little discussion.

No man can hope to become a good philosopher unless he has certain feelings which are not very common. He must have an intense desire to understand the world, as far as that is possible; and for the sake of understanding, he must be willing to overcome those narrownesses of outlook that make a correct perception impossible. He must learn to think and feel, not as a member of this or that group, but as just a human being. If he could, he would divest himself of the limitations to which he is subject as a human being.

Bertrand Russell, The Art of Philosophizing and other Essays, 1968.

It ends up that some of my friends view me as a philosopher, at least in this context, which I consider praise since I do want to understand the world, and I am willing to overcome the narrowness of outlook. I don’t really belong to any group as much as I orbit some. Of course, this quotation is powerful because to an extent we all see ourselves this way. Someone brought up ‘Warrior Philosopher’, and I pondered that. What does that mean? What is a warrior philosopher? As a writer, such characters would be interesting.

I dug around a bit in my mind of people who I would consider a warrior philosopher, which of course has my own bias in it. Some examples of warrior philosophers are:

  1. Marcus Aurelius (121-180 AD) – Roman Emperor and Stoic philosopher. He is best known for his work “Meditations,” which offers guidance on how to maintain composure, discipline, and a sense of ethics in the face of adversity. His reign and philosophical writings embody the Stoic virtues of wisdom, courage, and justice. As someone who considers himself somewhat of a Stoic, I do resonate with this personally.
  2. Sun Tzu (544–496 BC) – A Chinese general, military strategist, and author of “The Art of War,”1 a treatise on military strategy, tactics, and philosophy. His teachings have transcended military theory, influencing business tactics, legal strategy, lifestyles, and more.
  3. Miyamoto Musashi (1584–1645) – A famous Japanese swordsman, philosopher, strategist, and ronin. His book “The Book of Five Rings” (Go Rin no Sho) is a text on kenjutsu and the martial arts in general, but it also provides insights into a philosophical approach to conflict and strategy. He’s actually a personal favorite figure of mine.
  4. Arjuna (Epic Age of India) – A central character in the Indian epic Mahabharata. He was a skilled archer and warrior, and his philosophical discourse with Lord Krishna, which forms the basis of the Bhagavad Gita, addresses the moral and ethical dilemmas of warfare. I grew up in my teens exposed to Hinduism, and this was probably the most central part of it.
  5. King Leonidas of Sparta (c. 540-480 BC) – Although more known for his military leadership at the Battle of Thermopylae (300, the movie), Spartan culture emphasized a combination of physical excellence and intellectual education, and Leonidas, like many of his peers, would have been trained in philosophy as well as warfare.
  6. Al-Farabi (872–950 AD) – A renowned philosopher and jurist in the Islamic Golden Age who wrote extensively on political philosophy, metaphysics, and ethics. He was also known for his knowledge of music and its theory, showcasing a diverse set of intellectual pursuits.
  7. Yagyu Munenori (1571–1646) – A Japanese swordsman and founder of the Yagyu Shinkage-ryu school of swordsmanship. He served as a sword instructor and a military and political adviser to the Tokugawa shoguns. His works blend swordsmanship with Zen and Confucian philosophy.
  8. Gichin Funakoshi (1868–1957) – The founder of Shotokan Karate-do, viewed as a modern-day philosopher-warrior. He emphasized not only the physical aspects of martial arts but also the spiritual and ethical dimensions, advocating for Karate as a means of personal development.


Thus we can see parallels. A warrior philosopher, a figure combining the disciplines of martial prowess and deep philosophical understanding, would likely adhere to a set of tenets that balance physical strength, strategic acumen, and ethical or philosophical wisdom. These tenets could include:

  1. Discipline and Self-Control: Mastery over one’s own emotions and actions, maintaining composure in the heat of battle and in everyday life. One could even say grace.
  2. Courage and Bravery: Facing challenges head-on when necessary, both on the battlefield and in the pursuit of knowledge, without succumbing to fear or hesitation.
  3. Wisdom and Knowledge: Continual pursuit of understanding, both in martial arts and in the philosophical realms, seeking truth and deeper meanings in all experiences.
  4. Ethical Conduct and Integrity: Adhering to a strong moral code, treating others with respect, and maintaining honesty in all endeavors even when, and perhaps especially when, others aren’t aware.
  5. Strategic Thinking: Employing careful planning and foresight in all pursuits, understanding the broader implications of actions.
  6. Physical and Mental Endurance: Cultivating a strong body and mind to endure hardships, be it in battle or in the rigorous exploration of philosophical ideas.
  7. Compassion and Empathy: Recognizing the value of life and understanding the perspectives of others, both in warfare and in peace.
  8. Balance and Harmony: Striving for a balance between physical actions and mental beliefs, ensuring that one’s life is a reflection of one’s philosophy.
  9. Adaptability and Open-Mindedness: Being open to new ideas and adaptable to changing circumstances, both in combat tactics and in philosophical thought.
  10. Leadership and Responsibility: Taking responsibility for one’s actions and leading others by example, inspiring both courage in battle and thoughtful reflection in quieter times.

These tenets supposedly combine the virtues of a skilled warrior with the introspective depth of a philosopher, creating a holistic approach to life that values both action and contemplation. If we replace ‘combat’ with ‘confrontation’, we can see many more people around us every day that could qualify. Beware those that want to qualify.

What is perhaps most important about all of these figures is that they were capable of communicating their message not just by example but through the written word. In this way they left an indelible mark in their own ways, yet I didn’t add that in as a requirement because I have encountered people who fit the criteria yet don’t necessarily communicate further than their examples.

While writing all of this, I did note that we could possibly have Idiot Philosophers by the latter criteria, but I suppose that’s a nice post for another time.

  1. https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/132, free. ↩︎

Wit and Wisdom.

There are many ways to say things, and over time I learned that poking at the stupidity of an idea instead of a person was more productive. People like Jon Stewart and Jon Oliver make their points with humor, as did George Carlin and others. Douglas Adams. Mark Twain. Every single member of Monty Python.

If I missed someone, feel free to add them in the comments.

All of them flipped the world around, some still do, and showed us the world in a different way – a way that begged for some sort of change. Some people resist this, not acknowledging how silly the world is, this house of cards built by people doing what they think is best from moment to moment. The larger the systems, the more they are prone to silliness which can be terrible for some people and because others are immune, they don’t pay attention.

It takes wit and wisdom to point out those things, and I think it’s something we should all aspire to.

It’s when the silly things we do become cumulative in systems that we either let it pass or mock the silly things.

The Mango Tree

Mangos almost readyNear where I am planting roots, there is a bar with a mango tree across from it. Under the mango tree sits a bench, next to the bench sits a wooden wire spool.

This is the information superhighway of the village. This is where men who drink talk – no women come here, possibly because of the reputations of those that take the shade of the tree.

This is an intersection. Strange conversations happen here. Wisdom and foolishness are imparted with the fervor of alcohol. It is not a safe place, tempers can flare just as in any other place. It is not a place where the ‘successful’ lounge. But it is a place where the mangoes do not have far to fall – barely bruised sometimes, with the same value as the words that flow under the tree. Sometimes sweet, sometimes too ripe, sometimes not yet ready to be absorbed.

I stood under the tree recently, drinking water after having baked in the sun, and a younger head in the village and I discussed the problems with people who were developing land. It was not an accidental conversation, it was a conversation began because of who I am, so I listened. Behind the mango tree, maybe 300 meters away, the faint sound of a bulldozer was in play, but I was attuned to what the young rastafarian was saying.

He was saying things I agreed with. About how easy it is for people with machines at their command to set the time bombs under houses by grading below them. About how people liked to cast concrete around their homes, bag their leaves and cuttings, paying to have the bags taken – and all the while buying manure. It’s stupid, really, what people do. I’ve seen it a lot in developing nations, where concrete is poured like the alcohol in an alcoholics drink. Unsparingly.

It’s ugly. You can fool yourself into thinking otherwise, but it’s ugly.

I have seen pieces of my own land so developed by tenants, but I turn a blind eye to it, favoring instead where I am doing my planning. As I pass through, though, I see the large concrete houses and the span of concrete yards. Who am I to judge how others wish to live? No one. But I can certainly mock their choices, maybe bring some fertilizer down their way and sell it to them so that the plants they pay lip service to do not starve in their containers.

The younger man is surprised at how much I agree with, and when I chime in with thoughts of my own. We are not friends, we may never be friends, but we have learned something about each other and how we see the world. It is more alike than he had thought.

We talked about planting seeds in our land to grow trees – and how people would buy the very mangoes we were sitting under, spending $20TT on 4 or maybe 5 of them while we sat under it’s shade and ate on a whim.

I didn’t tell him about a conversation I’d had with another software engineer in the late 90s, where he had found out that I had land in Trinidad.

He had told me, “You’re crazy.”
“What?”
“Everyone here dreams of buying a piece of land in the Caribbean and you already have yours. What are you doing here?”

A fair question back then, a pivotal question that ate at me over the years. And here I was.

I picked up a freshly fallen mango, bit it’s meat off of it and sucked the seed clean, some of the strings sticking between my teeth. It was sweet.

I put the seed in the pickup, and my new acquaintance laughed.
“You’re going to plant that!”

A smile.

Too often we don’t plant the seeds of trees when we don’t expect to stand under their shade.

The Feline Meeting

business_meet_121125“I’ve come up with a way to skin the cat.”, said the junior software engineer at the end of his presentation. “It won’t take much in the way of resources, and we can have it done within a week.”

The senior software engineer studied the blueprint of the cat, glancing up and around, then back to the blueprint. He looked up again, around, then fixing his gaze on the junior software engineer said, “Using your method, we can only skin the cat once since the cat will then be dead. Are there any other ways to skin the cat? There’s usually more than one way.”

Another software engineer chimed in, “Well, we could re-skin the cat as we de-skin it.”

Everyone looked at him, puzzled, and the junior software engineer said, “So we won’t be actually skinning the cat?”

“No, no, we can get the skin of the cat while encapsulating it in another ‘skin'”, she said, using her fingers to make fingerquotes.

“That’s interesting.”, said the manager.

“So we use this process, but we use another process to re-skin the cat, and we can customize the skin to be what the owner of the cat wants?”, asked the saleswoman, immediately seeing a new market.

“But then we’ll be stuck with a skin of lesser market value, wouldn’t we?”, asks the business analyst.

The new CTO, exasperated, looks around the table. “No one here has yet shown me why we should skin the cat in the first place.”

The CEO looks over, “Well, I asked them if we could do it.”

Silence.

“Why?”

“I read it in a magazine article on the plane and we could get venture capital if we found a way to do it.”

Retrospect.

San Fernando Hill Views (2016)

Depth requires perspective, and perspective requires depth.

Intelligence requires wisdom, but wisdom does not require intelligence.

Wisdom requires time and experience, but the experience does not have to be within the same sphere.

In fact, sometimes it’s better if it’s not.

‘Older Heads’

deepartIn Trinidad, you have the ‘older heads’ – those that, by virtue of living longer are attributed a wisdom that the ‘younger heads’ do not have. People go to them for advice on all manner of things about life, be it business or pleasure. ‘Older heads’ are the ones with the answers, the advice, those that have had the privilege of living through choices good and bad.

Not long ago, I sat with two younger cousins, an Uncle only 13 years my senior and his wife – our Aunt. We had gone to Annie’s Restaurant for dinner where our connections allowed us to simply let our host pick out the dinner for us. We sat there, joking with each other, telling each other stories about things past. Being the 2nd eldest at the table, I had my own stories to share – we all do – and on the way up with my younger cousins, I spoke about the land and the respect for the people on it, and the way I have learned to do things… and how it allowed me to grow in ways that I would not have.

My second youngest cousin had prompted me in a conversation a day before, so at the table I said to the youngest, “Well – we used to have the older heads to ask about things. And now, look around. These are the older heads.”

I looked around, unsettled by the fact maybe more than those younger at the table. I’d just done my Will after I was reminded of my mortality and the fact that despite trying so hard otherwise, I would likely die of old age. My mind was on those I cared about, near and far, a context that I had been completely unprepared for. I’d had the pleasure of playing with my youngest nephew, a gift that allowed me to see life through younger eyes again, that reminded me of the trust and care that every child should have and so many do not… so many did not, including myself.

I had become an ‘older head’.

I had become someone that was respected by those that meant something to me. I had become someone that people listened to, whose words where important and even in that moment I wondered how everyone had changed so much… but we all had, and the most change was my own in my context. There was no pleasure in it, just a daunting responsibility to do the right things, to say the right things…

And even as I was trying to make a point to everyone at that table – that we were it, that we were now what we used to look up to, the responsibility felt heavy on my shoulders – an unannounced burden, an unsettling weight that was easy to carry and worrisome because it had become so easy to carry.

thosemountains.jpgIt was heavy on my mind throughout my trip to Trinidad. The thought of how a very small action could become either something very good or very bad – about how a word in the right place could move mountains, and a word in the wrong place would doom you to carrying the mountains. The thought of how a life I so recklessly lived for others meant so much to people who mattered, the thought of how a life I gave so willingly from meant so little to those who I gave it for meant so much to those I did not give it to… and the rare and pleasing occasions when I gave and received in amounts I found good enough. There is no equal. There are simply returns not to be measured.

Many will say that I’m not old enough to think some of the thoughts that I do, or to feel as I do, and I can’t argue their frame of reference.

My frame of reference is understanding that I can never go home, but that I can choose to be at home wherever I am. I have learned to take sacrifices for what they are, to know that some decisions might have been better with more knowledge and wisdom without the sting of regret that wounds so many. I have learned to embrace the unrequited, to be silent when words will have no effect, to deny what I want to get what I want, and to be myself and accept the good and bad within myself.

older headAs I told a younger person over a bottle of Angostura One on my last night in Trinidad in a rare moment when I could shoot straight with someone elusive even when there… we are not limited by those who have gone before. We are not doomed to their shadows by anything but ourselves, and within we have the capacity to dare to find the amazing human beings we are, to revel in the good and accept the bad.

And most of all, I have learned that while through attrition I have become one of the ‘Older Heads’ at some tables, I still have much to learn and that everyone and everything has something to teach me.